Friday open thread: I don't even know how to describe this one succinctly
Oct. 3rd, 2025 05:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Happy Friday! I'm tucked up in the living room with all the string lights on, while the rain pours against the windows, and I'm looking forward to a very cosy weekend, snuggled up inside against the elements.
This week's prompt is inspired by a short podcast which was being shared approvingly among all my academic research support librarian colleagues, on the 'broken' nature of academic publishing. In it, the participants talk about all the immense problems research dissemination faces: the fact that journal prestige is treated as a proxy for quality of research in job applications and promotions, 'double dipping' by publishing companies (i.e. making university libraries pay twice for the same journal subscription: once for reading access to the articles, and a second time to make articles Open Access when a researcher from the university publishes in that journal: did you know the typical cost to make an article Open Access is £1000-£2000 per article?), the predatory publishers and citation mills that have swooped in to exploit the immense pressure on academics to publish, inadequate peer review, etc etc. At the root of all this is organisations signing the DORA declaration and then ignoring it at every stage of the academic reward process.
I don't agree with the solutions proposed by the podcast participants, and I suspect most librarians won't either, but it is nice to hear these things being talked about outside my own little professional bubble. These issues are known by all in my professional context, but in my experience are not common knowledge outside it; if you've ever wondered why not all research articles are Open Access (or why the paywalls to read closed access articles ask the most absurd prices), this is why. (The other similar issue — common knowledge in libraries, not widely understood by the general public — is the predatory pricing models that publishers use for ebooks purchased by libraries.)
So, my prompt in light of all this is: what is something that's common knowledge in your professional (or perhaps hobby/volunteer) context, but not widely known or understood by the general public?
This week's prompt is inspired by a short podcast which was being shared approvingly among all my academic research support librarian colleagues, on the 'broken' nature of academic publishing. In it, the participants talk about all the immense problems research dissemination faces: the fact that journal prestige is treated as a proxy for quality of research in job applications and promotions, 'double dipping' by publishing companies (i.e. making university libraries pay twice for the same journal subscription: once for reading access to the articles, and a second time to make articles Open Access when a researcher from the university publishes in that journal: did you know the typical cost to make an article Open Access is £1000-£2000 per article?), the predatory publishers and citation mills that have swooped in to exploit the immense pressure on academics to publish, inadequate peer review, etc etc. At the root of all this is organisations signing the DORA declaration and then ignoring it at every stage of the academic reward process.
I don't agree with the solutions proposed by the podcast participants, and I suspect most librarians won't either, but it is nice to hear these things being talked about outside my own little professional bubble. These issues are known by all in my professional context, but in my experience are not common knowledge outside it; if you've ever wondered why not all research articles are Open Access (or why the paywalls to read closed access articles ask the most absurd prices), this is why. (The other similar issue — common knowledge in libraries, not widely understood by the general public — is the predatory pricing models that publishers use for ebooks purchased by libraries.)
So, my prompt in light of all this is: what is something that's common knowledge in your professional (or perhaps hobby/volunteer) context, but not widely known or understood by the general public?